<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal by determining that the rejection of the books of account and subsequent income additions were unjustified. It emphasized that the audited accounts were provided without material defects, underscoring the necessity for assessing officers to substantiate estimations and income additions with valid reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal by determining that the rejection of the books of account and subsequent income additions were unjustified. It emphasized that the audited accounts were provided without material defects, underscoring the necessity for assessing officers to substantiate estimations and income additions with valid reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>