<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 264 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking rectification under section 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961. It held that it lacked the power to review its own order on merits and declined to reexamine the issue, emphasizing the limitations on its authority to review orders. The original decision was upheld based on evidence and legal principles, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the request for rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 264 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking rectification under section 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961. It held that it lacked the power to review its own order on merits and declined to reexamine the issue, emphasizing the limitations on its authority to review orders. The original decision was upheld based on evidence and legal principles, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the request for rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>