<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 252 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification under section 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961, as it found no apparent mistake in its order dated 23rd Dec., 1997. The Tribunal concluded that the order had been finalized properly, considering all relevant facts and materials on record. As a result, both the initial application and a subsequent similar application for penalty were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 252 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification under section 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961, as it found no apparent mistake in its order dated 23rd Dec., 1997. The Tribunal concluded that the order had been finalized properly, considering all relevant facts and materials on record. As a result, both the initial application and a subsequent similar application for penalty were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>