<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unsecured loans and the disallowance of interest. The assessee successfully proved the identity of the creditors, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction, shifting the burden of proof onto the Department. Judicial precedents supported the assessee&#039;s position, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unsecured loans and the disallowance of interest. The assessee successfully proved the identity of the creditors, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction, shifting the burden of proof onto the Department. Judicial precedents supported the assessee&#039;s position, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>