<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of long-term capital gains on the transfer of a house for the assessment year 1993-94. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the assessee&#039;s investment in constructing a new house, of which he was a co-owner, qualified for exemption under section 54 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning convincing and concluded that no capital gains were chargeable. Consequently, both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of long-term capital gains on the transfer of a house for the assessment year 1993-94. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the assessee&#039;s investment in constructing a new house, of which he was a co-owner, qualified for exemption under section 54 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning convincing and concluded that no capital gains were chargeable. Consequently, both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>