<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 294 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions concerning additions and deletions based on surrendered income under s. 132(4) of the IT Act. The Tribunal underscored the necessity of corroborative evidence to substantiate additions and upheld the validity of retracted disclosures claimed to be made under duress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 294 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions concerning additions and deletions based on surrendered income under s. 132(4) of the IT Act. The Tribunal underscored the necessity of corroborative evidence to substantiate additions and upheld the validity of retracted disclosures claimed to be made under duress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>