<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 79 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57227</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Bardana loss, restricting it to Rs. 7,500 instead of the claimed Rs. 15,000 due to lack of substantiation. The addition of Rs. 1,83,042 under s. 145(1) was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT, except for a partial addition of Rs. 10,000 for undervaluation of closing stock. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 79 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57227</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Bardana loss, restricting it to Rs. 7,500 instead of the claimed Rs. 15,000 due to lack of substantiation. The addition of Rs. 1,83,042 under s. 145(1) was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT, except for a partial addition of Rs. 10,000 for undervaluation of closing stock. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>