<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal re-examined the evidence and directions from the High Court, concluding that the assessee successfully rebutted presumptions under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The penalty of Rs. 1,76,000 was canceled as the Revenue failed to prove conscious income concealment. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:13:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal re-examined the evidence and directions from the High Court, concluding that the assessee successfully rebutted presumptions under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The penalty of Rs. 1,76,000 was canceled as the Revenue failed to prove conscious income concealment. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>