<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and directed a fresh examination of the issues. The CIT(A) was instructed to reconsider the additions under Section 69, the notice under Section 148, and the admission of fresh evidence under Rule 46A, allowing both parties a reasonable opportunity. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 282 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and directed a fresh examination of the issues. The CIT(A) was instructed to reconsider the additions under Section 69, the notice under Section 148, and the admission of fresh evidence under Rule 46A, allowing both parties a reasonable opportunity. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>