<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 210 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57202</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the cost of acquisition for the shares. It upheld the additions of Rs. 16,81,750 and Rs. 74,64,000 as capital gains, included in the block assessment due to inadequate disclosure by the assessee. The issuance of the notice under section 158BD was validated as the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction was supported by substantial material, with no time limitation for initiating proceedings under the section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:40:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 210 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57202</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the cost of acquisition for the shares. It upheld the additions of Rs. 16,81,750 and Rs. 74,64,000 as capital gains, included in the block assessment due to inadequate disclosure by the assessee. The issuance of the notice under section 158BD was validated as the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction was supported by substantial material, with no time limitation for initiating proceedings under the section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>