<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57178</link>
    <description>Chapter XXA acquisition proceedings can be initiated only if the recorded reasons under section 269C show that understatement of consideration was linked to an object of facilitating tax avoidance or concealment of income or assets. Mere understatement of consideration, without that statutory satisfaction, is insufficient to confer jurisdiction. On that basis, the initiation of acquisition proceedings was held contrary to the prescribed procedure, and the acquisition order could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:41:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57178</link>
      <description>Chapter XXA acquisition proceedings can be initiated only if the recorded reasons under section 269C show that understatement of consideration was linked to an object of facilitating tax avoidance or concealment of income or assets. Mere understatement of consideration, without that statutory satisfaction, is insufficient to confer jurisdiction. On that basis, the initiation of acquisition proceedings was held contrary to the prescribed procedure, and the acquisition order could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>