<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 97 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57174</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant the renewal of registration to a dissolved firm for the assessment year, distinguishing between renewal and grant of registration. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the accurate interpretation of the application submitted by the assessee and aligning with precedent in similar cases involving dissolved firms. The benefit of registration was maintained for the assessee firm for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 97 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57174</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant the renewal of registration to a dissolved firm for the assessment year, distinguishing between renewal and grant of registration. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the accurate interpretation of the application submitted by the assessee and aligning with precedent in similar cases involving dissolved firms. The benefit of registration was maintained for the assessee firm for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>