<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 106 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for Post-Warranty Service Charges, rejecting the CIT&#039;s decision to treat the entire amount as income at the time of receipt. The Tribunal also supported the cash payment made to the Managing Director on a bank holiday, finding it justified under Rule 6DD exceptions. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT&#039;s action under Section 263 was unwarranted, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:43:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 106 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for Post-Warranty Service Charges, rejecting the CIT&#039;s decision to treat the entire amount as income at the time of receipt. The Tribunal also supported the cash payment made to the Managing Director on a bank holiday, finding it justified under Rule 6DD exceptions. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT&#039;s action under Section 263 was unwarranted, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>