<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 38 -  ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57155</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the revenue was estopped from challenging the section 154 order passed by the CIT after an appeal against the substantive order. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow depreciation on a building disallowed by the ITO but allowed by the CIT for the assessment year 1977-78. The judgment also discussed the interpretation of the term &#039;owned by the assessee&#039; for claiming depreciation and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the tax treatment of an annuity policy amount as constructive receipt. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a CBDT circular and previous tribunal rulings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s reference application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 38 -  ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57155</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the revenue was estopped from challenging the section 154 order passed by the CIT after an appeal against the substantive order. The Tribunal directed the ITO to allow depreciation on a building disallowed by the ITO but allowed by the CIT for the assessment year 1977-78. The judgment also discussed the interpretation of the term &#039;owned by the assessee&#039; for claiming depreciation and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the tax treatment of an annuity policy amount as constructive receipt. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a CBDT circular and previous tribunal rulings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s reference application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>