<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 37 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57151</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the CIT&#039;s decision confirming the charging of interest under section 216 of the IT Act, 1961. It ruled that the assessing officer did not specify the basis for charging interest and failed to prove that the advance tax estimate was understated. Consequently, the tribunal vacated the CIT&#039;s decision and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:18:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 37 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57151</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the CIT&#039;s decision confirming the charging of interest under section 216 of the IT Act, 1961. It ruled that the assessing officer did not specify the basis for charging interest and failed to prove that the advance tax estimate was understated. Consequently, the tribunal vacated the CIT&#039;s decision and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>