<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57145</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not leviable where the return was filed late after notice under section 148 but the advance tax paid exceeded the tax ultimately assessed on reassessment. Because no assessed tax remained, the computation provision for this penalty could not operate on the facts, and delay alone was insufficient to sustain the levy. The cancellation of penalty was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57145</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not leviable where the return was filed late after notice under section 148 but the advance tax paid exceeded the tax ultimately assessed on reassessment. Because no assessed tax remained, the computation provision for this penalty could not operate on the facts, and delay alone was insufficient to sustain the levy. The cancellation of penalty was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>