<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 122 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57126</link>
    <description>Remuneration and director&#039;s fee paid to directors were not treated as excessive where the company, though not carrying on active business, had income from partnership interests and the directors were attending to its interests in those firms. On those facts, the tribunal found that the total payments were justified and the disallowance was not warranted. The deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 122 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57126</link>
      <description>Remuneration and director&#039;s fee paid to directors were not treated as excessive where the company, though not carrying on active business, had income from partnership interests and the directors were attending to its interests in those firms. On those facts, the tribunal found that the total payments were justified and the disallowance was not warranted. The deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>