<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57119</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 17(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act is valid only where there is a real failure to disclose fully and truly all primary material facts; on the stated facts, the assessing authority already knew the property and its sale-related particulars, and the later sale after the valuation date could not justify reopening. For wealth-tax valuation, sale consideration does not automatically represent fair market value where the transaction reflects a special or fancy price rather than an ordinary market price; valuation must instead be tested against the surrounding material, including approved valuation evidence and comparable rents or properties. The reassessment and the disputed wealth addition were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57119</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 17(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act is valid only where there is a real failure to disclose fully and truly all primary material facts; on the stated facts, the assessing authority already knew the property and its sale-related particulars, and the later sale after the valuation date could not justify reopening. For wealth-tax valuation, sale consideration does not automatically represent fair market value where the transaction reflects a special or fancy price rather than an ordinary market price; valuation must instead be tested against the surrounding material, including approved valuation evidence and comparable rents or properties. The reassessment and the disputed wealth addition were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>