<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 209 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act were not justified. The penalties were set aside, and the penalties for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the assessees acted under a bona fide belief and were not guilty of contumacious or dishonest conduct. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were ultimately removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 209 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act were not justified. The penalties were set aside, and the penalties for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the assessees acted under a bona fide belief and were not guilty of contumacious or dishonest conduct. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were ultimately removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>