<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 146 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961 was justified as the audit report was obtained before the specified date and filed along with the belated return under section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized that in such cases, no penalty could be imposed. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 1 lac imposed on the assessee, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:11:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 146 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961 was justified as the audit report was obtained before the specified date and filed along with the belated return under section 139(4). The Tribunal emphasized that in such cases, no penalty could be imposed. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 1 lac imposed on the assessee, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>