<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 240 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57077</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act was dismissed, as the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no justification for the disallowance. On the other hand, the assessee&#039;s cross-objection challenging the disallowance of interest under section 40A(2) of the IT Act was allowed by the Tribunal, which deemed the interest rate of 12% reasonable based on trade norms, contrary to the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:03:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 240 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57077</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act was dismissed, as the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no justification for the disallowance. On the other hand, the assessee&#039;s cross-objection challenging the disallowance of interest under section 40A(2) of the IT Act was allowed by the Tribunal, which deemed the interest rate of 12% reasonable based on trade norms, contrary to the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>