<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 384 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction of losses on revaluation of securities, affirming these as stock-in-trade for the banking company. For embezzlement losses, the Tribunal partially allowed the deductions for 1983-84 and remanded the 1984-85 issue for further verification by the AO. Appeals for 1983-84 and 1984-85 were partly allowed, while those for 1982-83, 1985-86, 1991-92, and 1988-89 were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 384 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction of losses on revaluation of securities, affirming these as stock-in-trade for the banking company. For embezzlement losses, the Tribunal partially allowed the deductions for 1983-84 and remanded the 1984-85 issue for further verification by the AO. Appeals for 1983-84 and 1984-85 were partly allowed, while those for 1982-83, 1985-86, 1991-92, and 1988-89 were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>