<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 429 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57066</link>
    <description>Section 154 rectification cannot be used to withdraw exemption on interest from non-resident external account deposits where entitlement depends on residential status under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and compliance with RBI guidelines, because that issue is not a patent mistake apparent from the record. Where determining the exemption requires enquiry beyond the return and accompanying papers, the proper course is reassessment rather than rectification. The appellate authority may also admit fresh material evidence going to the root of the exemption claim when it is necessary to decide the correct tax liability. On that basis, the rectification orders were held without jurisdiction and the addition made by rectification was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 429 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57066</link>
      <description>Section 154 rectification cannot be used to withdraw exemption on interest from non-resident external account deposits where entitlement depends on residential status under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and compliance with RBI guidelines, because that issue is not a patent mistake apparent from the record. Where determining the exemption requires enquiry beyond the return and accompanying papers, the proper course is reassessment rather than rectification. The appellate authority may also admit fresh material evidence going to the root of the exemption claim when it is necessary to decide the correct tax liability. On that basis, the rectification orders were held without jurisdiction and the addition made by rectification was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>