<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 277 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57058</link>
    <description>Subscriptions collected under a chit fund scheme were not treated as deposits because they were non-refundable contributions to the common fund, not amounts received with an obligation of repayment to the subscriber. On that basis, a chit fund company governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982 did not fall within the definition of a credit institution or a residuary non-banking company under the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The RBI framework was also noted as excluding chit subscriptions from the concept of deposit, and the regulatory directions for residuary non-banking companies did not support bringing such a company within the Act. Accordingly, interest on loans was not chargeable to tax under the Interest Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 277 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57058</link>
      <description>Subscriptions collected under a chit fund scheme were not treated as deposits because they were non-refundable contributions to the common fund, not amounts received with an obligation of repayment to the subscriber. On that basis, a chit fund company governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982 did not fall within the definition of a credit institution or a residuary non-banking company under the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The RBI framework was also noted as excluding chit subscriptions from the concept of deposit, and the regulatory directions for residuary non-banking companies did not support bringing such a company within the Act. Accordingly, interest on loans was not chargeable to tax under the Interest Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>