<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 296 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for M/s. Assam Tea Co. and M/s. Ashoka Industries, finding the reassessment invalid due to insufficient evidence. Interest charges under sections 139(8) and 215 were also annulled. In the case of M/s. Bant Ram &amp; Co., the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upheld the time-barred notice under section 148, and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, rendering the alternative prayer for deletion of addition on merits moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 296 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for M/s. Assam Tea Co. and M/s. Ashoka Industries, finding the reassessment invalid due to insufficient evidence. Interest charges under sections 139(8) and 215 were also annulled. In the case of M/s. Bant Ram &amp; Co., the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upheld the time-barred notice under section 148, and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, rendering the alternative prayer for deletion of addition on merits moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>