<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 144 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalty imposed under section 271B of the IT Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments on the initiation and timing of penalty proceedings, as well as the change of accounting year, were rejected. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the actions of the authorities, affirming the penalty decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 144 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalty imposed under section 271B of the IT Act. The appellant&#039;s arguments on the initiation and timing of penalty proceedings, as well as the change of accounting year, were rejected. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the actions of the authorities, affirming the penalty decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>