<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 112 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57052</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) confirmed a penalty under section 271B against the appellant, who challenged the penalty on various grounds. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments, the CIT(A) upheld the penalty, finding the explanations inadequate. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on an additional ground related to the limitation for imposing penalties under the Income-tax Act, determining that the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was invalid due to exceeding the prescribed time frame. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 112 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57052</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) confirmed a penalty under section 271B against the appellant, who challenged the penalty on various grounds. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments, the CIT(A) upheld the penalty, finding the explanations inadequate. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on an additional ground related to the limitation for imposing penalties under the Income-tax Act, determining that the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was invalid due to exceeding the prescribed time frame. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalty under section 271B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>