<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 216 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the addition of Rs. 1,00,464 made by the AO on account of alleged unexplained investment. The Tribunal also deleted similar additions for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1993-94. Ground Nos. 5 and 6 were dismissed as infructuous. All appeals were allowed partly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 216 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the addition of Rs. 1,00,464 made by the AO on account of alleged unexplained investment. The Tribunal also deleted similar additions for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1993-94. Ground Nos. 5 and 6 were dismissed as infructuous. All appeals were allowed partly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>