<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 113 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57045</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow rectification and consider the signed audit report for the deduction under section 80HHC. The ITAT concluded that subsequent submission of evidence should allow for rectification under section 154, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s refusal based on the unsigned audit report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 113 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57045</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow rectification and consider the signed audit report for the deduction under section 80HHC. The ITAT concluded that subsequent submission of evidence should allow for rectification under section 154, contrary to the Assessing Officer&#039;s refusal based on the unsigned audit report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>