https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57044 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders. It determined that the co-owners did not establish a legal partnership and that the income from the property should be classified as income from house property rather than business income. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s decision well-founded, with no legal flaws, and rejected the Revenue's arguments. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:47:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57044 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the CIT(A)'s orders. It determined that the co-owners did not establish a legal partnership and that the income from the property should be classified as income from house property rather than business income. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s decision well-founded, with no legal flaws, and rejected the Revenue's arguments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57044