<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 85 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57032</link>
    <description>Acquisition jurisdiction under Chapter XX-A required reliable material supporting a reason to believe that sale consideration was understated and a clear, evidence-based finding that the understatement was intended to reduce or evade tax liability. An Inspector&#039;s report was insufficient because it did not establish a site visit or address essential valuation factors, including location, shape, neighbourhood, physical condition and filling costs for depressed plots. Without reliable material and the required finding of tax-evasion intent by either transferor or transferee, the jurisdictional conditions for acquisition were not met; the acquisition order was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:08:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 85 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57032</link>
      <description>Acquisition jurisdiction under Chapter XX-A required reliable material supporting a reason to believe that sale consideration was understated and a clear, evidence-based finding that the understatement was intended to reduce or evade tax liability. An Inspector&#039;s report was insufficient because it did not establish a site visit or address essential valuation factors, including location, shape, neighbourhood, physical condition and filling costs for depressed plots. Without reliable material and the required finding of tax-evasion intent by either transferor or transferee, the jurisdictional conditions for acquisition were not met; the acquisition order was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>