<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 131 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57031</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to a seven-day delay in filing. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, the Tribunal found it unjustified as the assessee satisfactorily explained discrepancies, with no evidence of fraud or wilful neglect. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 131 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57031</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred due to a seven-day delay in filing. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, the Tribunal found it unjustified as the assessee satisfactorily explained discrepancies, with no evidence of fraud or wilful neglect. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>