<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Competent Authority&#039;s decision to treat multiple sale transactions as a single deal was incorrect. It was determined that each transaction should be assessed separately, resulting in the cancellation of acquisition proceedings for all six sale deeds. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdiction, independent assessment, and adherence to legal precedents in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Competent Authority&#039;s decision to treat multiple sale transactions as a single deal was incorrect. It was determined that each transaction should be assessed separately, resulting in the cancellation of acquisition proceedings for all six sale deeds. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdiction, independent assessment, and adherence to legal precedents in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>