<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 117 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the decision to disallow the salary paid to S. Boota Singh under Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that salary paid to a partner, regardless of individual or representative capacity, is treated as a share of profits and is non-deductible under Section 40(b), in line with established case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 117 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the decision to disallow the salary paid to S. Boota Singh under Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that salary paid to a partner, regardless of individual or representative capacity, is treated as a share of profits and is non-deductible under Section 40(b), in line with established case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>