<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 243 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57023</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue against the CIT(A)&#039;s order under section 249(3) condoning the delay in filing appeals were deemed competent. The Tribunal directed that the appeals be posted for hearing on merits, aligning with the majority opinion that an order under section 249(3) should be treated as an order under section 250 for appeal purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 243 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57023</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue against the CIT(A)&#039;s order under section 249(3) condoning the delay in filing appeals were deemed competent. The Tribunal directed that the appeals be posted for hearing on merits, aligning with the majority opinion that an order under section 249(3) should be treated as an order under section 250 for appeal purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>