<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 113 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the disallowance of excessive interest under section 40A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the disallowance unsustainable as the assessing officer did not provide sufficient evidence to justify it. Additionally, the Tribunal canceled the levy of interest under section 215, as it was found that the assessing officer did not actually levy interest under that section but merely made an observation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 113 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the disallowance of excessive interest under section 40A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the disallowance unsustainable as the assessing officer did not provide sufficient evidence to justify it. Additionally, the Tribunal canceled the levy of interest under section 215, as it was found that the assessing officer did not actually levy interest under that section but merely made an observation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>