<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 111 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56985</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to apply a 10% net profit rate for a MES Contractor due to accounting defects. Depreciation and interest were allowed based on a CBDT Circular, with no new factors for disallowance. The invocation of the proviso to section 145(1) was deemed justified, resulting in a low net profit rate. Past assessments and CBDT Circulars were considered, but the principle of res judicata was not strictly applied. The AO&#039;s method was supported, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 111 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56985</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to apply a 10% net profit rate for a MES Contractor due to accounting defects. Depreciation and interest were allowed based on a CBDT Circular, with no new factors for disallowance. The invocation of the proviso to section 145(1) was deemed justified, resulting in a low net profit rate. Past assessments and CBDT Circulars were considered, but the principle of res judicata was not strictly applied. The AO&#039;s method was supported, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>