<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56984</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar considered the interpretation of orders under section 260(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in cases where the High Court ruled in favor of the revenue. The Tribunal found that parties must be afforded an opportunity to be heard before such orders are passed. Due to the absence of a hearing, the Tribunal rectified its orders under section 260(1), setting them aside and directing fresh hearings after providing notice to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56984</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar considered the interpretation of orders under section 260(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in cases where the High Court ruled in favor of the revenue. The Tribunal found that parties must be afforded an opportunity to be heard before such orders are passed. Due to the absence of a hearing, the Tribunal rectified its orders under section 260(1), setting them aside and directing fresh hearings after providing notice to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>