<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order under Section 263 as the ITO did not err in following existing Tribunal decisions. The ITO properly investigated and allowed the weighted deduction under Section 35B, and adequately examined the expenditures in question. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and reinstated the ITO&#039;s assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 88 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to revise the assessment order under Section 263 as the ITO did not err in following existing Tribunal decisions. The ITO properly investigated and allowed the weighted deduction under Section 35B, and adequately examined the expenditures in question. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and reinstated the ITO&#039;s assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>