<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 75 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to cancel assessments for the years 1975-76 and 1977-78 under the Wealth Tax Act. The AAC&#039;s cancellation was based on procedural grounds, including the invalidity of assessment proceedings and the interpretation of &quot;duplicate return.&quot; The Tribunal found that the AAC erred in admitting additional evidence without proper procedure, and the term &quot;duplicate return&quot; did not support the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal upheld the assessments, ruling that the notice under section 17 did not invalidate them. The case was remanded for further proceedings, dismissing cross-objections and allowing appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 75 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to cancel assessments for the years 1975-76 and 1977-78 under the Wealth Tax Act. The AAC&#039;s cancellation was based on procedural grounds, including the invalidity of assessment proceedings and the interpretation of &quot;duplicate return.&quot; The Tribunal found that the AAC erred in admitting additional evidence without proper procedure, and the term &quot;duplicate return&quot; did not support the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal upheld the assessments, ruling that the notice under section 17 did not invalidate them. The case was remanded for further proceedings, dismissing cross-objections and allowing appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>