<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 118 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unwarranted as there was no concealment of income or filing of inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal emphasized that the revised return under the Amnesty Scheme did not imply an admission of guilt and cited various judicial precedents. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:04:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 118 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unwarranted as there was no concealment of income or filing of inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal emphasized that the revised return under the Amnesty Scheme did not imply an admission of guilt and cited various judicial precedents. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>