<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 64 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56930</link>
    <description>Trading additions based on alleged absence of a stock register and additions on cash credits required fresh factual examination where the appellate findings were inconsistent or incomplete. The Tribunal remitted the trading addition issue for a clear finding on stock register maintenance and remitted the cash credit issue because the assessee had not satisfactorily established creditor identity, capacity, and genuineness. The disallowance of entertainment expenses was also remitted for proper inquiry into the expenditure bifurcation and applicable restriction. By contrast, the deletion of disallowances relating to miscellaneous expenses, staff maintenance, and vehicle maintenance was upheld on the facts, with staff welfare and vehicle expense treatment accepted as business-related.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 64 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56930</link>
      <description>Trading additions based on alleged absence of a stock register and additions on cash credits required fresh factual examination where the appellate findings were inconsistent or incomplete. The Tribunal remitted the trading addition issue for a clear finding on stock register maintenance and remitted the cash credit issue because the assessee had not satisfactorily established creditor identity, capacity, and genuineness. The disallowance of entertainment expenses was also remitted for proper inquiry into the expenditure bifurcation and applicable restriction. By contrast, the deletion of disallowances relating to miscellaneous expenses, staff maintenance, and vehicle maintenance was upheld on the facts, with staff welfare and vehicle expense treatment accepted as business-related.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>