<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, overturning the restriction on standard deduction under s. 16(i) of the IT Act, 1961 to Rs. 1,000 and the disallowance of medical allowance. It held that the local outdoor duty allowance was for reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in the performance of duties, not conveyance allowance. The assessee was deemed entitled to the deduction under s. 16(i) of the Act, as the allowance was not subject to the Rs. 1,000 restriction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, overturning the restriction on standard deduction under s. 16(i) of the IT Act, 1961 to Rs. 1,000 and the disallowance of medical allowance. It held that the local outdoor duty allowance was for reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in the performance of duties, not conveyance allowance. The assessee was deemed entitled to the deduction under s. 16(i) of the Act, as the allowance was not subject to the Rs. 1,000 restriction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>