<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56920</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, directing a re-examination of the assessment issues related to cash purchases exceeding the limit and treatment of credits in partners&#039; names. The Tribunal set aside the assessment under section 144 and disallowance under section 40A(3), emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the details provided by the assessee. Furthermore, the Tribunal overturned the inclusion of partners&#039; credits as unexplained income, highlighting that the burden of proof was met by identifying the depositors as partners. The rejection of registration was also overturned, stressing the necessity for a fresh evaluation in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56920</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, directing a re-examination of the assessment issues related to cash purchases exceeding the limit and treatment of credits in partners&#039; names. The Tribunal set aside the assessment under section 144 and disallowance under section 40A(3), emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the details provided by the assessee. Furthermore, the Tribunal overturned the inclusion of partners&#039; credits as unexplained income, highlighting that the burden of proof was met by identifying the depositors as partners. The rejection of registration was also overturned, stressing the necessity for a fresh evaluation in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>