<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 83 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the expenses related to Central Dharamshala, Thakurdwara, and Veohar were deductible annual charges under Section 24(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal found that these expenses were diverted by an overriding title as per the Compromise Decree, thereby not forming part of the assessee&#039;s income. Consequently, the assessment was to be adjusted by the Income Tax Officer in accordance with this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 83 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the expenses related to Central Dharamshala, Thakurdwara, and Veohar were deductible annual charges under Section 24(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal found that these expenses were diverted by an overriding title as per the Compromise Decree, thereby not forming part of the assessee&#039;s income. Consequently, the assessment was to be adjusted by the Income Tax Officer in accordance with this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>