<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the AAC&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of debts secured on fixed deposit receipts. The Tribunal held that as none of the assets were entirely exempt from wealth tax, the debt deduction of Rs. 82,000 was permissible under the WT Act, 1957. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Act and the specific circumstances of the case, where the aggregate value of the assets exceeded the exemption limit, supporting the allowance of the debt deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the AAC&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of debts secured on fixed deposit receipts. The Tribunal held that as none of the assets were entirely exempt from wealth tax, the debt deduction of Rs. 82,000 was permissible under the WT Act, 1957. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Act and the specific circumstances of the case, where the aggregate value of the assets exceeded the exemption limit, supporting the allowance of the debt deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>