<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 98 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56907</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant registration to the assessee firm, rejecting the ITO&#039;s denial based on the firm&#039;s constitution changes. The tribunal distinguished the case from a precedent and found the Explanation to section 185(1) of the Act inapplicable. Relying on legal authorities, including a Supreme Court case, the tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to registration, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 98 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56907</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant registration to the assessee firm, rejecting the ITO&#039;s denial based on the firm&#039;s constitution changes. The tribunal distinguished the case from a precedent and found the Explanation to section 185(1) of the Act inapplicable. Relying on legal authorities, including a Supreme Court case, the tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to registration, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>