<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 74 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the registration of a partnership firm for income tax purposes, despite the absence of actual business operations during the relevant previous year. The decision emphasized that the firm&#039;s investments and preparations for business activities, such as construction and procurement of machinery, demonstrated a genuine intent to engage in the rice milling business, justifying registration. The Tribunal ruled that the mere absence of business activities in the previous year should not be the sole basis for denying registration to a legitimate firm, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the partnership firm&#039;s registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 74 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the registration of a partnership firm for income tax purposes, despite the absence of actual business operations during the relevant previous year. The decision emphasized that the firm&#039;s investments and preparations for business activities, such as construction and procurement of machinery, demonstrated a genuine intent to engage in the rice milling business, justifying registration. The Tribunal ruled that the mere absence of business activities in the previous year should not be the sole basis for denying registration to a legitimate firm, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the partnership firm&#039;s registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>