<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and ordering the firm&#039;s registration for the years in question. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claim of Benami arrangements and the presence of genuine partnership elements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating all circumstances to determine the legitimacy of a firm and its partners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (6) TMI 44 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and ordering the firm&#039;s registration for the years in question. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claim of Benami arrangements and the presence of genuine partnership elements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating all circumstances to determine the legitimacy of a firm and its partners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>