<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 95 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee had concealed income by manipulating its cash book, resulting in a suppression of assets and income. The penalty was imposed in accordance with the law existing at the time the return was filed, reducing the penalty to the minimum under pre-amendment provisions. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the concealment of income and adjusting the penalty calculation based on the law prior to the amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=95329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 95 - ITAT ALLAHABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee had concealed income by manipulating its cash book, resulting in a suppression of assets and income. The penalty was imposed in accordance with the law existing at the time the return was filed, reducing the penalty to the minimum under pre-amendment provisions. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the concealment of income and adjusting the penalty calculation based on the law prior to the amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=56867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>